22 September 2011 Endnote Library
. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. (1976) Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.htmlCopyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (1998).
. Special Theme: Online Communities. (2005). Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 10
. Google Sketchup. (2006-2009). Mountain View: Google Sketchup.
. Fundamental. (2009) Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary: Merriam-Webster Online.
. Special Issue on Politeness and Computer-Mediated Communication. (2010). Journal of Politeness Research 6
. Bible Gateway. (n.d.) Retrieved Various, 2010-2012, from http://www.biblegateway.com/
. British National Corpus. (n.d.) Retrieved Various, 2010-2012, from http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
. Google. (n.d.) Retrieved Various, 2010-2012, from http://www.google.com
. Wikipedia. (n.d.) Retrieved Various, 2010-2012, from http://www.wikipedia.org
Aaroncast86. (2010). How I found the YouTube Community Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZZniWhwaDc
Abrams, D. (1996). Social identity, self as structure and self as process. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 143-167). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In J. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 179–193).
Adam, A., & Mowers, H. (2007). YouTube comes to the classroom. School Library Journal, 53(1), 22.
Adami, E. (2009). ‘We/YouTube’: exploring sign-making in video-interaction. Visual Communication, 8(4), 379.
Akou, H. M. (2010). Interpreting Islam through the Internet: making sense of hijab. Contemporary Islam, 1-16.
Alexa. (n.d.). YouTube - Site info from Alexa Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com#keywords
Allington, D. (2007). “How Come Most People Don't See It?”: Slashing the Lord of the Rings. Social Semiotics, 17(1), 43-62.
Alonzo, M., & Aiken, M. (2004). Flaming in electronic communication. Decision Support Systems, 36(3), 205-213.
Alzbouebi, K. (2006). Dilemmas of translation and identity: ethnographic research in multilingual homes Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.ling-ethnog.org.uk/documents/papers/alzouebi2006.pdf
Ammerman, N. T. (1982). Operationalizing evangelicalism: An amendment. SA. Sociological Analysis, 170-171.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and Limitations of Discourse-Centred Online Ethnography. Language@Internet Retrieved February 17, 2010, from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1610/index_html/?searchterm=None
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). Localising the global on the participatory web. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Handbook of language and globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Angeli, A. D., & Brahnam, S. (2008). I hate you! Disinhibition with virtual partners. Interacting with computers, 20(3), 302-310.
Angouri, J., & Tseliga, T. (2010). you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT! A study of impoliteness strategies in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research. Special Issue on Politeness and Computer-Mediated Communication.
Arensberg, C. M., & Kimball, S. T. (1965). Culture and community: New York, Harcourt.
Aristotle (Producer). (n.d.). Poetics. Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/poetics.mb.txt
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation: Sage Publications, Inc.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Baker, P. (2001). Moral panic and alternative identity construction in Usenet. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7(1).
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Austin Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bamberg, M. (2004). Considering counter narratives. Considering counter narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense, 351-371.
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Banton, M. (2011). A Theory of Social Categories. Sociology, 45(2), 187.
Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. G., & Wallington, A. M. (2004). Varieties and directions of interdomain influence in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 1-30.
Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and communication, 18, 133-170.
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and where It's Heading. London: Routledge.
Barr, D. J. (2004). Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(6), 937-962.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(04), 577-660.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
Bartkowski, J. (1996). Beyond biblical literalism and inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the hermeneutic interpretation of scripture. Sociology of Religion, 57(3), 259-272.
Bauer, M. W. (2000). Classic Content Analysis: A review. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: Sage.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: seeking safety in an insecure world: Polity Pr.
Bebbington, D. W., & Bebbington, D. (1989). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. London: Routledge.
Beebe, L. M. (1995). Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Sociolinguistic Aspects (pp. 154-168). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bell, R. (2011). Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived: HarperOne.
Benevenuto, F., Duarte, F., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V. A. F., Almeida, J. M., & Ross, K. W. (2008). Understanding video interactions in YouTube. Paper presented at the 16th ACM international conference on Multimedia
Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bernauer, J. W., & Carrette, J. R. (2004). Michel Foucault and theology: the politics of religious experience: Ashgate Pub Ltd.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195.
Bhatia, V. (1998). Generic conflicts in academic discourse. In I. Fontanet, J. C. Palmer, S. Posteguillo & J. F. Coll (Eds.), Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 15-28). Bancaixa: Fundacio Caixa Castello.
Bhatia, V. (1999). Integrating products, processes, purposes and participants in professional writing. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. London: Longman (pp. 21–39). London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. (2002). Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos (AELFE)(4), 3-19.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing: Cambridge University Press.
Bielo, J. (2009). Words upon the Word: an ethnography of evangelical group Bible study. New York: NYU Press.
Billig, M. (1982). Ideology and Social Psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage Publications.
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27-52.
Blood, R. (2004). How blogging software reshapes the online community. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 53-55.
Bodenhausen, G. V., Mussweiler, T., Gabriel, S., & Moreno, K. N. (2001). Affective influences on stereotyping and intergroup relations. Handbook of affect and social cognition, 319–343.
Boone, K. C. (1989). The Bible tells them so: The discourse of Protestant fundamentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Bousfield, D. (2007). Beginnings, middles and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2185-2216.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in the struggle for power. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bousfield, D. (2010). Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In M. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics (pp. 101–136). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A. (2008). Impoliteness in language: studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112(1), 193-216.
Bradner, E. (2001). Social affordances of computer-mediated communication technology: understanding adoption (pp. 67-68): ACM New York, NY, USA.
Brandel, M. (2007). Blog trolls and cyberstalkers: How to beat them. Computerworld, May 28, 32.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307-324.
British Association of Applied Linguistics. (n.d.). BAAL Research Guidelines Retrieved 11 November, 2008, from www.baal.org.uk/about_goodpractice_full.pdf
Broadbent, S. (2009). How the Internet enables intimacy Retrieved 03 November, 2009, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Lk5nU8FrXo
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), 40-57.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization science, 12(2), 198-213.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and Spontaneity: Knowledge and Organization. In I. Nonaka & D. Teece (Eds.), Managing industrial knowledge (pp. 44-67). London: Sage.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brownlow, C., & O'Dell, L. (2002). Ethical Issues for Qualitative Research in On-line Communities. Disability & Society, 17(6), 685-694.
Bruckman, A. (1996). Gender swapping on the Internet. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in cyberspace (pp. 317–325). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bruckman, A. (2002). Ethical Guidelines for Research Online Retrieved 10 November, 2008, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~asb/ethics/
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2008, 15–18 October). Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community. Paper presented at the Internet Research 9.0: Rethinking Community, Rethinking Place, Copenhagen.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Burke, K. (1945). A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice Hall.
Burkhalter, M. (1999). Reading race online. In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 60–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Byrne, D. N. (2008). Public discourse, community concerns, and civic engagement: Exploring Black social networking traditions on BlackPlanet.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 319–340.
Cai, S. (2011). Unpublished Thesis.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in Educational Research. London: Continuum.
Cameron, L. (2007). Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5: John Benjamins.
Cameron, L. (2007). Metaphor and Talk. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222.
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use; An Applied Linguistic Approach (pp. 45-62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cameron, L. (2010). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 77-96). London: Equinox.
Cameron, L. (2010). Metaphor and Reconciliation: The Discourse Dynamics of Empathy in Post-Conflict Conversations. London: Routledge.
Cameron, L. (2010). Metaphors and discourse activity. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 147-161). London: Equinox.
Cameron, L. (2010). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 3-25). London: Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690.
Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L., Low, G., & Maslen, R. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89.
Cameron, L., & Stelma, J. (2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 7–36.
Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1978). Form and genre in rhetorical criticism: An introduction. In K. K. Campbell & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre: Shaping rhetorical action (pp. 9–32). Falls Chruch, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Chafe, W. (1988). Punctuation and the prosody of written language. Written communication, 5(4), 395-426.
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the Structure of Language.
Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). The handbook of language variation and change: Wiley-Blackwell.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Cienke, A. (2008). [Personal communication].
Cienki, A. (2010). Multimodal metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Cienki, A. J., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clarke, M. (2009). The discursive construction of interpersonal relations in an online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2333-2344.
Conrad, S. (2000). Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 548-560.
Conway, M., & McInerney, L. (2008). Jihadi video and auto-radicalisation: evidence from an exploratory YouTube study. Intelligence and Security Informatics, 108-118.
Cook, V. J. (1988). Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
Coopey, J., & Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 869-886.
Cosentino, V. J. (1994). Virtual legality. Byte, 19(3).
Coulthard, M. (1992). Advances Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Coupland, N. (2010). The Handbook of Language and Globalization: Wiley-Blackwell.
Court, J. M. (1997). Reading the New Testament. London: Routledge.
Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527-540.
Cox, A. M. (2006). Making mischief on the web. Time (December) Retrieved May 31, 2011, from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1570701,00.html
Creese, A. (2008). Linguistic ethnography. Encyclopedia of language and education, 2, 229-241.
Crisp, P. (2005). Allegory and symbol-a fundamental opposition? Language and Literature, 14(4), 323.
Crisp, P. (2008). Allegory: Conceptual metaphor in history. Language and Literature, 10(1), 5.
crosisborg. (2009). Yokeup Reaches New Low (Adult Language) Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLmNL5QbpYw
Crumlish, C. (1995). The Internet Dictionary: The Essential to Netspeak. Hoboken, USA: Sbyex.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2002). Language and the Internet. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(2), 142-144.
Cubbison, L. (1999). Configuring LISTSERV, configuring discourse. Computers and Composition, 16(3), 371-381.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness* 1. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1), 35-72.
Culpeper, J. (2008). Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In D. Bousfield & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in language: studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin: Walter de Qruyter.
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., & Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), 1545-1579.
Danet, B., & Herring, S. (Eds.). (2007). The Multilingual Internet. New York: Oxford University Press.
DarkTheAtheist. (2010). An Atheist Community Divided, Over Petty Arguments. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_jY_djcfrY
Database, U. S. L. (1988). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Retrieved 23 July, 2009, from http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2250249
Daugherty, T., Lee, W. N., Gangadharbatla, H., Kim, K., & Outhavong, S. (2005). Organizational virtual communities: Exploring motivations behind online panel participation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4).
Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical inquiry, 5(1), 31-47.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. London: Transworld Publishers.
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. G. W. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deignan, A. (2008). Corpus linguistic data and conceptual metaphor theory. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach (pp. 149-162). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
Deignan, A. (n. d.). Conceptual Metaphor Theory Retrieved 9 March, 2009, from http://creet.open.ac.uk/projects/metaphor-analysis/theories.cfm?paper=cmt
Denzin, N. K. (1999). Cybertalk and the method of instances Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 107-125). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M. Y., & Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 319-324.
Dixon, R. D., Jones, L. P., & Lowery, R. C. (1992). Biblical authority questions: Two choices in identifying conservative Christian subcultures. Sociology of Religion, 53(1), 63.
DrakeSizzle. (2010). How I found the YouTube Community Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tbhJXsfLoo&feature=fvw
Drew, P. (1978). Accusations: The Occasioned Use of Members' Knowledge ofReligious Geography'in Describing Events. Sociology, 12(1), 1.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 119-146.
Duff, P. A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23(3), 289.
Duguid, P. (2005). “The art of knowing”: social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109-118.
Duman, S., & Locher, M. A. (2008). 'So let's talk. Let's chat. Let's start a dialog': An analysis of the conversation metaphor employed in Clinton's and Obama's YouTube campaign clips. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 27(3), 193-230.
Dvorak, J. C. (1994). The Flaming of Madison Ave. Marketing Computers, 14, 22.
Eagly, A. H., Baron, R. M., & Hamilton, V. (2004). The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice: American Psychological Association.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual review of anthropology, 21, 461-490.
Edwards, D. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15-33). London: Sage.
Edwards, D. (2000). Discourse and Cognition. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol, 10, 79-83.
Edwards, D. (2008). Intentionality and mens rea in police interrogations: The production of actions as crimes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 5(2), 177-199.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2005). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Eglin, P. (2002). Members' gendering work: women, 'feminists' and membership categorization analysis. Discourse and Society, 13(6), 819-826.
Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (1992). Category, predicate and task: The pragmatics of practical action. Semiotica, 88(3/4), 243-268.
Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Ehrich, J. F. (2006). Vygotskian Inner Speech and the Reading Process. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 6, 12-25.
Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers: Oxford University Press, USA.
Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195-203.
Emigh, W., & Herring, S. C. (2005). Collaborative authoring on the web: A genre analysis of online encyclopedias. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Engeström, R. (1995). Voice as communicative action. Mind, culture, and activity, 2(3), 192-215.
Erickson, T. (1997). Social interaction on the net: Virtual community as participatory genre. Paper presented at the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Eubanks, P. (2000). A war of words in the discourse of trade: The rhetorical constitution of metaphor: Southern Illinois Univ Pr.
Evaldsson, A. C. (2005). Staging insults and mobilizing categorizations in a multiethnic peer group. Discourse & Society, 16(6), 763-786.
Evaldsson, A. C. (2007). Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls' relational talk. Research on Language and Social interaction, 40(4), 377-404.
Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities (Vol. 323, pp. 1103-1105): Br Med Assoc.
Fahey, T., & Prevost, R. (1994). net. speak: The Internet dictionary: Hayden Books, Indianapolis.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Pearson.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power. Essex: Pearson.
fakesagan. (2007). fake hips and hippy christians (part 1 of 3) Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmhCgxGz26E
fakesagan. (2007). fake hips and hippy christians (part 2 of 3) Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Twm4nRphik
fakesagan. (2007). fake hips and hippy christians (part 3 of 3) Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qovTzwl97cc
fakesagan. (2007). jezuzfreek thinks he's the pope of youtube (part 1 of 2) Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qovTzwl97cc
fakesagan. (2007). jezuzfreek thinks he's the pope of youtube (part 2 of 2) Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qovTzwl97cc
fakesagan. (2007). moderate* christian stem cell responses - jezuzfreek777 Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI4sXm_ARIY
Fauconnier, G. (1984). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. Language, 113-130.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 133-187.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1999). Metonymy and conceptual integration. Metonymy in Language and Thought, 77-90.
Fauconnier, G., Turner, M., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities: Basic Books New York:.
Fernback, J., & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry, Failure? Retrieved July 16, 2011, from http://www.rheingold.com/texts/techpolitix/VCcivil.html
Ferris, P. (1997). What is CMC? An overview of scholarly definitions Retrieved March 21, 2011, from http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1997/jan/ferris.html
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA.
Flewitt, R., Hampel, R., Hauck, M., & Lancaster, L. (2009). What are multimodal data and transcription? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Oxford: Routledge.
Forrester, D. (1981). Biblical interpretation and cultural relativism. In M. Wadsworth (Ed.), Ways of Reading the Bible. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1981). The orders of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the Text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at Dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198-227.
Fozdar, F. (2008). Duelling discourses, shared weapons: rhetorical techniques used to challenge racist arguments. Discourse & Society, 19(4), 529.
Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet Retrieved 15 June, 2009, from http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf
Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219-236.
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.
Frekko, S. E. (2009). Signs of Respect: Neighborhood, Public, and Language in Barcelona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(2), 227-245.
Gadamer, H. G., Weinsheimer, J., & Marshall, D. G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward Ltd.
Gal, S., & Woolard, K. A. (2009). Constructing languages and publics: Authoriy and representation. Pragmatics, 5(2), 129-138.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2010). The YouTubification of politics, impoliteness and polarization. In T. Rotimi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Discourse Behaviour and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction (pp. 540-563): IGI Global.
Geertz, C., & Banton, M. (1966). Religion as a cultural system.
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 19, 223-248.
Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2000). The organizational learning of safety in communities of practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7-18.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (2001). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3-4), 347-358.
Gibbs, R. (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. (2008). Metaphors, Snowflakes, and Termite Nests: How Nature Creates Such Beautiful Things. Paper presented at the International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor Cáceres, Spain.
Gibbs, R. (2011). The Allegorical Impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 121-130.
Gibbs, R., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 64–75.
Gibbs, R., & O'Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 523–530.
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 133.
Gibson, J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. London: Routledge/Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Giglioli, P. P. (1972). Language and social context: selected readings: Penguin books.
Given, L. M. (2002). Discursive constructions in the university context: social positioning theory and mature undergraduates’ information behaviour. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 127-142.
Glucksberg, S. (1991). Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion. Psychological Science, 2(3), 146-152.
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean* 1. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1541-1558.
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms (Vol. 36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C. (2000). Polysemy: A problem of definition Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches (pp. 129–151). New York: Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1976). Gender Advertisements. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 3, 65-154.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk: Univ of Pennsylvania Pr.
Gomm, R., & Davies, C. (2000). Using evidence in health and social care: Sage Publications Ltd.
Gomm, R., & Woods, P. (1993). Educational research in action: Paul Chapman Educational Publishing.
Gottschalk, P., & Greenberg, G. (2008). Islamophobia: making Muslims the enemy: Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101-124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Graham, S. L. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict,(im) politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 742-759.
Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and Children at Work: Heinemann Educational Books.
Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20-35.
Greene, R. A. (2010). Pakistan shuts down Facebook over 'Draw Mohammed Day'. CNN. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2010-05-19/tech/pakistani.facebook.shutdown_1_facebook-council-on-american-islamic-relations-muslim-groups?_s=PM:TECH
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Grube, G. M. A. (1958). Aristotle on Poetry and Style. New York: The Library of Liberal Arts.
Gruber, H. E. (1988). Coping with multiplicity and ambiguity of meaning in works of art. Metaphor and Symbol, 3(1), 183-189.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Language and social identity: Cambridge Univ Press.
Haenfler, R. (2004). Rethinking subcultural resistance. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33(4), 406-436.
Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (1976). Resistance through rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hammersley, M. (2003). Recent Radical Criticism of Interview Studies: any implications for the sociology of education? (Vol. 24, pp. 119-126): JSTOR.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(2), 215-242.
Harré, R., & van Lagenhove, L. (1998). Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. London: Blackwell Publishers.
Harris, S. (2004). The End of Faith. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Harrison, S. (2000). Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an email discussion group. In L. Pemberton & S. Shurville (Eds.), Words on the web: Computer-mediated communication (pp. 69-78). Exeter: Intellect.
Hartley, J. (2009). Uses of YouTube: digital literacy and the growth of knowledge. In J. Burgess & J. Green (Eds.), YouTube : Online Video and Participatory Culture (pp. 126-143). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self categorization and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 251-277.
Haugh, M. (2010). When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 7–31.
Haverkate, H. (1990). A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 77-109.
Heffernan, V. (April 4, 2006). Comic shorts, home on the Web, The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/04/arts/04iht-videos.html
Henri, F., & Pudelko, B. (2003). Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 474-487.
Herring, S. (1995). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.
Herring, S. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Herring, S. (1996). Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. The Information Society, 12(2), 153–168.
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
Herring, S. (2002). Computer mediated communication on the internet. Annual review of information science and technology, 36(1), 109-168.
Herring, S. (2003). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 612–634). Oxford: Blackwell.
Herring, S. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, S. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society, 6(1), 26–36.
Herring, S., Bucholtz, M., Liang, A., Sutton, L., & Hines, C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame.
Herring, S., Scheidt, L. A., Bonus, S., & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs.
Herring, S., Scheidt, L. A., Kouper, I., & Wright, E. (2006). A longitudinal content analysis of weblogs: 2003-2004. Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media, Routledge, London, 3–20.
Hess, A. (2010). Democracy through the Polarized Lens of the Camcorder: Argumentation and vernacular spectacle on YouTube in the 2008 Election. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47, 106-122.
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (Vol. 4). Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
Hester, S., & Hester, S. (2010). Conversational actions and category relations: An analysis of a children’s argument. Discourse Studies, 12(1), 33-48.
Hilderbrand, L. (2007). YouTube: Where cultural memory and copyright converge. Film Quarterly, 61(1), 48–57.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography: Sage Publications Inc.
Hogg, M. (2004). Social Identity Theory. In A. H. Eagly, R. M. Baron & V. Hamilton (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 111-136): American Psychological Association.
Hogg, M., & Terry, D. (2000). Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121-140.
Hogg, M., Terry, D., & White, K. (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28(02), 173-183.
Holquist, M. (1991). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
Holquist, M., & Emerson, C. (1981). The Glossary for The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist & C. Emerson, Trans.): University of Texas Press.
Honeck, R. P., & Temple, J. G. (1994). Proverbs: The extended conceptual base and great chain metaphor theories. Metaphor and Symbol, 9(2), 85-112.
Hopper, P. (1992). Emergence of grammar. Bright, W. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 364–367.
Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self categorization Theory: A Historical Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204-222.
Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2002). Getting Serious Online. Pew Internet and American Life Project Retrieved May 30, 2011, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED462978
Houdek, M. (2011). What Did She Say!? How Context Affects Hearer Perceptions of Offensive Language. Paper presented at the iMean2, University of West England, Bristol, UK.
Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 59-83.
Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2009). Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse & Society, 20(3), 345-362.
Hunter, J. D. (1982). Operationalizing evangelicalism: A review, critique & proposal. Sociology of Religion, 42(4), 363-372.
Hymes, D. H. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice: Routledge.
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8(2-3), 223-248.
Jacobson, D. (1996). Contexts and cues in cyberspace: The pragmatics of naming in text-based virtual realities. Journal of Anthropological Research, 52(4), 461-479.
Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge/Kegan & Paul.
Jewitt, C. (2002). The move from page to screen: the multimodal reshaping of school English. visual communication, 1(2), 171-195.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241.
Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
jezuzfreek777. (2008). Am I the Pope of YouTube? Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPlEqALvvJU&watch_response
jezuzfreek777. (2008). Is stem cell research wrong Retrieved 26 November, 2008, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJHgOHmLU0Q
jezuzfreek777. (2008). YOUTUBE GATHERING GOES WRONG Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBRAqQekSEg
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1-16.
Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The internet and higher education, 4(1), 45-60.
Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence. London: Penguin.
Jones, G. M., & Schieffelin, B. B. (2009). Talking text and talking back. “My BFF Jill” from Boob Tube to YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1050-1079.
Jones, R. H. (2009). Technology and sites of display. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Oxford: Routledge.
Jones, S. (1995). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community: Sage Publications.
Jones, S. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 10-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jones, S. (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
jthunder73. (2008). THE JAVID RANT! Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU8cn0BORDA&feature=related
Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 193-218.
Kayany, J. M. (1998). Contexts of uninhibited online behavior: Flaming in social newsgroups on Usenet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(12), 1135-1141.
Keane, W. (2003). Public speaking: On Indonesian as the language of the nation. Public Culture, 15(3), 503.
Keisler, S. (Ed.). (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Keller, R. (1994). On language change: The invisible hand in language. Oxford: Routledge.
Keller, S. (2003). Community: pursuing the dream, living the reality: Princeton University Press.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American psychologist, 39(10), 1123-1134.
King, S. A. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119–128.
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection, and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kittay, E. F. (1987). Metaphor. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kluver, R., Detenber, B., Lee, W. P., Hameed, S. B. S., Chen, Y., & Cheong, P. H. (2008). The Internet and Religious Harmony in Singapore. In E. Lai (Ed.), Religious Diversity in Singapore (pp. 434-456). Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies.
KnuckleheadReality. (2009). none yo bidness...Sometimes the truth is in the lies....sometimes Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/user/KnuckleheadReality?feature=chclk#p/u/4/rV_cFRU9ks8
Koller, V., & Davidson, P. (2008). Social exclusion as conceptual and grammatical metaphor: a cross-genre study of British policy-making. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 307.
Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the Virtual Commons: Cooperation and Conflict in Computer Communities. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistics, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kreitzer, M. Transforming Worldviews: An Anthropological Understanding of How People Change. Global Missiology English, 2(7).
Kress, G. (2009). Assessment in the perspective of a social semiotic theory of multimodal teaching and learning. Educational Assessment in the 21st Century, 19-41.
Kress, G. (2010). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 54-67). London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design: Psychology Press.
Kreuz, R. J., Long, D. L., & Church, M. B. (1991). On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 149-162.
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1993). On Satire and Parody: The Importance of Being Ironic. Metaphor and Symobolic Activity 8(2), 12.
Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1995). Two Cues for Verbal Irony: Hyperbole and the Ironic Tone of Voice. Metaphor and Symobolic Activity, 10(1), 10.
Kuiper, K., & Lin, D. T. G. (1989). Cultural congruence and conflict in the acquisition of formulae in a second language'in O. In O. Garcia & R. Otheguy (Eds.), English Across Cultures: Cultures Across English. Mouton (pp. 281-304).
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insults. Studies in social interaction, 120-169.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. (1989). The exact description of the speech community: Short a in Philadelphia. In R. Fasold & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Language change and variation (pp. 1–57). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (2003). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind: University of Chicago Press Chicago.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought: Basic Books.
Lakoff, R. T. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8(2-3), 101-130.
Lange, P. (2006). What is your claim to flame? First Monday 11(9). Retrieved March 21, 2010, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1393/1311
Lange, P. (2007). Commenting on comments: Investigating responses to antagonism on YouTube. Paper presented at the Society for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, Florida
Lange, P. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–380.
Lange, P. (2007). Searching for the ‘You’ in ‘YouTube’: An analysis of online response ability. Paper presented at the EPIC 2007, Keystone, CO, USA.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, B. (1995). Defenders of God: the fundamentalist revolt against the modern age. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Lepper, G. (2000). Categories in text and talk. London: Sage.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorization: 'us', 'them' and 'doing violence' in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 15(2-3), 243-266.
Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4(1), 11.
LiftALoft. (2009). To HisLivingSacrifice: Stay strong! Retrieved August 19, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grhp6FAgCCk
LiftALoft. (2010). 1 Corinthians 6: A message to Leah, Jeff, and the entire YouTube Christian Community Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzuOYpwhhYA
Linn, R. (1991). Holocaust metaphors and symbols in the moral dilemmas of contemporary Israeli soldiers. Metaphor and Symbol, 6(2), 61-86.
Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lorenzo-Dus, N., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., & Bou-Franch, P. (2011). On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics.
Low, G., & Cameron, L. (1999). Researching and applying metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Low, G., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A. (2008). Metaphor Use in Three UK University Lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455.
Luchjenbroers, J., & Aldridge-Waddon, M. (2011). Paedophiles and politeness in email communications: Community of practice needs that define face-threat. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(1), 21-42.
MacKinnon, R. C. (1992). Searching for the Leviathan in Usenet. Master's Theses. Paper 479. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/479
Madden, M. (2007). Online Video: 57% of internet users have watched videos online and most of them share what they find with others. Pew Internet & American Life Project, July, 25.
Maia, M., Almeida, J., & Almeida, V. (2008). Identifying user behavior in online social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Social network systems
Malley, B. (2004). How the Bible works: An anthropological study of evangelical Biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press.
Malley, B. (forthcoming). Biblical authority: A social scientist's perspective.
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online: Sage Publications Inc.
Mao, L. M. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory:[] Face'revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451-486.
Markman, E. M. (1991). Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Marlow, C. (2004). Audience, structure and authority in the weblog community, from http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:96eWZkHU4DwJ:scholar.google.com/+cameron+marlow&hl=en
Martin, J. R. (1993). A contextual theory of language. Pittsburgh, USA: University of Pittsburgh.
Marty, M. E., & Appleby, R. S. (1992). The glory and the power: The fundamentalist challenge to the modern world. Boston: Beacon Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). The German Ideology Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works (Vol. 5). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 403-426.
Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Politeness and conversational universals–observations from Japanese. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8(2-3), 207-222.
Maudlin, M. (2011). Rob Bell’s Hell Retrieved July 9, 2011, from http://www.newsandpews.com/2011/07/rob-bells-hell-by-mickey-maudlin-harperone-senior-v-p-executive-editor/
Maybin, J. (2005). 'Speech genres' and 'evaluation' in socialisation and identity: older children's language practices. Paper presented at the Bakhtin, Language & Discourse Seminar, King's College London. http://www.ling-ethnog.org.uk/documents/papers/maybin2005.pdf
Maybin, J. (2009). Four Conceptions of Voice. Paper presented at the Work in Progress Seminar (The Open University), The Open Univeristy.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2001). Size isn't everything: spoken English, corpus, and the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 337-340.
McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27(2), 109-126.
McHoul, A. W., & Grace, W. (1997). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power, and the subject: NYU Press.
McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on Usenet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 90-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McMurria, J. (2006). The YouTube Community Retrieved 23 March, 2009, from http://flowtv.org/?p=48
Meier, A. J. (1995). Defining politeness: Universality in appropriateness. Language sciences, 17(4), 345-356.
Meier, A. J. (1995). Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 381-392.
Merriam-Webster. (2009). Fundamental Retrieved 15 July, 2009, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamental
Michalak, E. E., & Szabo, A. (1998). Guidelines for Internet Research: An Update. European Psychologist, 3, 70-75.
Mihelj, S., van Zoonen, L., & Vis, F. (forthcoming). Cosmopolitan Communication On-Line: YouTube Responses to the Anti-Islam Film Fitna. British Journal of Sociology.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly journal of speech, 70(2), 151-167.
Miller, C. R., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Blogging as social action: A genre analysis of the weblog. Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs Retrieved May 26, 2011, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_a_genre_analysis_of_the_weblog.html
Minshe, G., & Glance, N. (2006). Leave a Reply: An Analysis of Weblog Comments Retrieved 25 April, 2007, from http://staff.science.uva.nl/~gilad/pubs/www2006-blogcomments.pdf
Mio, J. S., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). Humor, language, and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 6(2), 87-102.
Mio, J. S., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). Humor, language, and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 6(2), 87-102.
Mio, J. S., & Katz, A. N. (Eds.). (1996). Metaphor: Implications and Applications. Mahwa: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moor, P. J., Heuvelman, A., & Verleur, R. (2010). Flaming on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1536–1546.
Morris, S. (2004). Shoot first, ask questions later: Ethnographic research in an online computer gaming community. Media International Australia, 110, 31–41.
Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Society Against Nature: The Emergence of Human Societies: Humanities Press.
Moscovici, S., & Doise, W. (1994). Conflict and Consensus: A General Theory of Collective Decisions: Sage.
Muhr, T. (1993-2011). ATLAS.ti [computer software]. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.
Musolff, A. (2000). Mirror images of Europe. München: iudicium.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and symbol, 21(1), 23-38.
Myers, G. (2010). Discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.
Myers, G. (2010). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 263-275.
Nagata, J. (2001). Beyond theology: Toward an anthropology of" fundamentalism". American Anthropologist, 103(2), 481-498.
nalts. (2011). Is YouTube a Community? Retrieved June 25, 2011, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_1j48RP9Rg&feature=feedu
Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87.
Nelson, T. D. (2009). Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Nephtali1981. (2010). Yokeup, I disagree: Unbelievers are not Human Garbage & no such thing as sissy christians Retrieved October 7, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2AwJbqYvwk
Nichani, M., & Hung, D. (2002). Can a Community of Practice Exist Online? Educational Technology, 42(4), 49-54.
Noll, M. A. (2001). American evangelical Christianity: an introduction. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Noll, M. A., Bebbington, D. W., & Rawlyk, G. A. (1994). Evangelicalism: comparative studies of popular protestantism in North America, the British Isles, and beyond, 1700-1990: Oxford Univ. Press.
North, S. (2007). 'The Voices, the voices': Creativity in online conversation. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 538–555.
Nuttall, G. F. (1992). The Holy Spirit in Puritan faith and experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nwoye, O. G. (1992). Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(4), 309-328.
O’Donnell, S., Gibson, K., Milliken, M., & Singer, J. (2008). Reacting to YouTube Videos: Exploring Differences Among User Groups. Proceedings of the International Communication Association Annual Conference
O’Sullivan, P. B., & Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5(1), 69-94.
O'Brien, D. S., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2006). Digital copyright law in a YouTube world. Internet Law Bulletin, 9(6 & 7), 71–74.
O'Brien, D. S., & Fitzgerald, B. F. (2009). Digital copyright law in a YouTube world.
O'Driscoll, J. (1996). About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(1), 1-32.
Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and thought: Cambridge University Press.
Osborne, G. R. (2006). The hermeneutical spiral: A comprehensive introduction to Biblical interpretation: Ivp Academic.
Packer, J. I. (1978). The Evangelical Anglican Identity Problem: An Analysis. Oxford: Latimer.
Palmquist, R. A. (1996). The search for an Internet metaphor: a comparison of literatures.
Panyametheekul, S., & Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/panya_herring.html
PaulsEgo. (2009). A Spotlight. Retrieved 2010, October 5, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEvsCXHmWuw
Paulus, T. M. (2004). Collaboration or cooperation? Small group interactions in a synchronous educational environment. Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, 100–124.
PeaceInChristAlone. (2010). Yokeup Are These Poor People Human Garbage? Retrieved October 7, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqMhtiLcqeA
Peplow, D. (In press). "Oh, I've known a lot of Irish people". Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature.
Perelman, C. (1979). The new rhetoric and the humanities: Essays on rhetoric and its applications: Kluwer Academic.
Pfannenstiel, A. N. (2010). Digital literacies and academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(2), 41-49.
philhellenes. (2009). YouTube's Psychopath: Yokeup. Retrieved October 7, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX5jzMkHL80
Pihlaja, S. (2009). The Pope of YouTube: A case study of dynamic metaphor use in asynchronous Internet communication. Master of Research, The Open University, Milton Keynes.
Pihlaja, S. (2010). The Pope of YouTube: Metaphor and Misunderstanding in Atheist-Christian YouTube Dialogue. The Journal of Inter-Religious Dialogue, 3, 25-35.
Pihlaja, S. (2011). Cops, popes, kings, and garbagemen: A case study of dynamic metaphor use in asynchronous Internet communication. Language@Internet, 8(1). Retrieved from Language@Internet website: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2011/pihlaja
Pihlaja, S. (forthcoming, 2012). 'Are you religious or are you saved?’: Defining membership categorisation rules in religious discussions on YouTube. Fieldwork in Religion, 6(1).
Pihlaja, S. (forthcoming, 2012). Truck stops and fashion shows: A case study of the discursive construction of Evangelical Christian group identity on YouTube. In D. Herbert & M. Gillespie (Eds.), Social Media, Religion and Spirituality. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction: Sage Publications Ltd.
Pragglejaz group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(2), 1–39.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 741.
Preece, J., & Maloney Krichmar, D. (2005). Online communities: Design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(4).
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.
Psathas, G. (1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies, 22(2), 139-162.
Purcell, W. M. (1990). Tropes, transsumptio, assumptio, and the redirection of studies in metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 5(1), 35-53.
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents: Longman Pub Group.
Rampton, B., Tusting, K., Maybin, J., Barwell, R., Creese, A., & Lytra, V. (2004). UK Linguistic Ethnography: A Discussion Paper Retrieved March 3, 2010, from http://www.ling-ethnog.org.uk.
Ray, D. G., Mackie, D. M., Rydell, R. J., & Smith, E. R. (2008). Changing categorization of self can change emotions about outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1210-1213.
Rheingold, H. (1993; 2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ribeiro, B. T. (2006). Footing, positioning, voice. Are we talking about the same things? In A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritchie, D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ritchie, D. (2010). Between mind and language: A journey worth taking. In L. Cameron & L. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. (pp. 57-76). London: Equinox.
Ritchie, D., Rigano, S., & Lowry, J. (2000). Shifting power relations in the getting of wisdom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2).
Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 35-54.
Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623-639.
Rosch, E. (1974). Linguistic relativity. In A. Sliverstein (Ed.), Human communication: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Halsted Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 104(3), 192-233.
Rosch, E. (1975). The nature of mental codes for color categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(4), 303-322.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In B. B. Lloyd & E. Rosch (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-48). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 4(3), 328-350.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Santa Ana, & Parodi, C. (1998). Modeling the speech community: Configuration and variable types in the Mexican Spanish setting. Language in Society, 27(01), 23-51.
Sauer, C. (1996). SPEAKING on the USENET: Social factors in language use. Ohio University working papers in linguistics and language teaching(15), 57-64.
Scheffler, I. (1979; 2010). Beyond the lette (Routledge Revivals)r: A philosophical inquiry into ambiguity, vagueness and metaphor in language. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: The Free Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462-482.
Schenkein, J. (1978). Studies in the organization of conversational interaction: Academic Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1988). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (2003). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Wiley.
Schofield, J. W. (2002). Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 171-203). Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
Schrage, M. (1997). Mr. Bozo, meet Miss Courtesy Worm. Computerworld, 31(8), 37.
Schwarz, B. (Ed.). (1978). On Ideology. London: Hutchison & Co.
Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2004). Applied linguistics as social science: Continuum International.
Selvan, A. M. M. K. S. (2003). Support and spewing: everyday activities of online Hindu groups. In K. C. Ho, R. Kluver & K. Yang (Eds.), Asia.com: Asia encounters the Internet (pp. 228-248). London: Routledge.
Semino, E., Short, M., & Wynne, M. (1999). Hypothetical words and thoughts in contemporary British narratives. Narrative, 307-334.
Sherer, P. D., Shea, T. P., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), 183-194.
Sherif, M. (1988). The Robbers Cave experiment: Intergroup conflict and cooperation. Scranton, PA: Wesleyan University Press.
Shigemasu, E., & Ikeda, K. (2006). Face threatening act avoidance and relationship satisfaction between international students and Japanese host students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(4), 439-455.
Shin, J. (2008). Morality and internet behavior: A study of the Internet Troll and its relation with morality on the Internet. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 19(5), 2834-2840.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Sider, J. W. (1995). Interpreting the Parables: A Hermeneutical Guide to Their Meaning. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 37(2), 157-187.
Singer, J. B. (1996). Virtual anonymity: Online accountability and the virtuous virtual journalist. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 11(2), 95-106.
Snelson, C. (2008). YouTube and beyond: Integrating web-based video into online education. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 19(2), 732–737.
Soukup, C. (2000). Building a theory of multi-media CMC: An analysis, critique and integration of computer-mediated communication theory and research. New Media & Society, 2(4), 407–425.
Southern Baptist Convention. (n.d.). The Baptist Faith and Message Retrieved October 13, 2010, from http://www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp#i
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002). Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations* 1. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(5), 529-545.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. London: Blackwell Publishers.
Steen, G. (2002). Towards a procedure for metaphor identification. Language and Literature, 11(1), 17-33.
Steen, G. (2007). Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 213–241.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213-241.
Stefik, M. (1996). Internet dreams: Archetypes, myths, and metaphors: MIT press.
Stelma, J. H., & Cameron, L. J. (2007). Intonation units in spoken interaction: Developing transcription skills. Text and talk, 27(3), 361–393.
Stommel, W. (2008). Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@ Internet 5. Retrieved Jul 16, 2011, from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2008/1537
Strangelove, M. (2010). Watching YouTube: extraordinary videos by ordinary people. Toronto Univ of Toronto Press.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings.
Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247.
Swann, J., & Allington, D. (2009). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247-264.
Sweeney, D. A. (2005). The American evangelical story: a history of the movement: Baker Academic.
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.
Tajfel, H. (1977). Social psychology and social reality. New Society, 39, 653-654.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H. (1983). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33, 47.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austi (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tannen, D. (2003). The relativity of linguistic strategies: rethinking power and solidarity in gender dominance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tay, D. (2011). THERAPY IS A JOURNEY as a discourse metaphor. Discourse Studies, 13(1), 445–463.
Teich, A., Frankel, M. S., Kling, R., & Lee, Y. (1999). Anonymous communication policies for the Internet: Results and recommendations of the AAAS conference. The Information Society, 15(2), 71-77.
Tendhal, R., & Gibbs, R. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864.
Terkourafi, M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (Eds.), Language, Power, and Social Process (pp. 45-74).
TheOriginalHamster. (2009). yokeup the crackwhore Retrieved March 6, 2011, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usEOTu78FC8
thetalesend. (2010). Re: How I found the YouTube Community Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an76iKN7Gko
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L. B., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
TJdoeslife. (2010). 76K for Charity Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA75Cm7F1rs
Tokunaga, M. (1992). Dichotomy in the structures of honorifics of Japanese. Pragmatics, 2(2), 127-140.
Tönnies, F., & Loomis, C. P. (2002). Community and society: Dover Pubns.
Turner, J. (1981). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 93-118.
Turner, J. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 2, 77-122.
Turner, J., & Hogg, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. London: Blackwell.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (2011). A self-categorization theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume Two, 399.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbol, 10(3), 183–204.
Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187.
Tusting, K., & Maybin, J. (2007). Linguistic ethnography and interdisciplinarity: Opening the discussion. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 575-583.
Twitter. (n.d.). About Twitter Retrieved 20 July, 2009, from http://twitter.com/about
US Copyright Office. (2006). U.S. Copyright Office - Fair Use Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Vaananen, K., & Schmidt, J. (1994). User interfaces for hypermedia: how to find good metaphors?
Valsiner, J. (2003). Beyond social representations: A theory of enablement. Papers on Social Representations, 12(1), 7.1–7.6.
van Dijk, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41-58.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach: Sage Publications.
van Zoonen, L., Hirzalla, F., & Müller, F. (2009). Fitna: The Video Battle Retrieved August 23, 2010, from http://xn--2012-4q4c3a3lc.com/departments/ss/research/FITNA/pdfs/BJoS%20Fitna%20Van%20Zoonen,%20Muller,%20Hirzalla.pdf
van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (2010). Performing citizenship on YouTube: activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 249-262.
van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (2011). YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: Video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media & Society.
van Zoonen, L., Vis, F., & Mihelj, S. (forthcoming). YouTube interactions between agonism, antagonism and dialogue: video responses to the anti-Islam film Fitna. New Media & Society.
Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1349-1371.
Vaughan, E. (2007). ‘I think we should just accept… our horrible lowly status’: Analysing Teacher–Teacher Talk Within the Context of Community of Practice. Language Awareness, 16(3), 173-189.
Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123–132.
Vergani, M., & Zuev, D. (n.d.). Uyghur videos on YouTube: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Contemporary China.
Vidich, A. J. (1964). Reflections on community studies: Wiley.
Vis, F., van Zoonen, L., & Mihelj, S. (2011). Women responding to the anti-Islam film Fitna: voices and acts of citizenship on YouTube. Feminist Review, 97(1), 110-129.
Voloshinov, V. N., Matejka, L., & Titunik, I. R. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Vygotsky, L. (1987). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky New York: Plenum Press.
Wadsworth, M. (1981). Making and interpreting scripture. In M. Wadsworth (Ed.), Ways of Reading the Bible. Brighton: The Harvester Press Limited.
Wallace, P. M. (2001). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
walllofweird. (2010). Re: How I Found the YouTube Community Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydePC3uDjMw
Walther, J. B. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205–216.
Walton, D. (1996). Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof. Argumentation, 10(1), 47-58.
Wang, H., & Hong, Y. (1995). Flaming: More Than a Necessary Evil for Academic Mailing Lists. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 261).
Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The forms of power. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Wasko, M. M. L., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Mis Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
Watts, R. J., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (1992). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watts, R. J., Ide, S., & Ehlich, K. (1992). Politeness in language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 1-5.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard business review, 78(1), 139-146.
Werkhofer, K. T. (1992). Traditional and modem views: the social constitution and the power of politeness. In R. J. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice (pp. 155-197). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Werth, P. (1994). Extended metaphor—A text-world account. Language and Literature, 3(2), 79-103.
Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction. Social Problems, 24(5), 521-529.
Wetherell, M. (1996). Identities, groups and social issues (Vol. 3). London: Sage.
Wetherell, M. (2007). A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 661-681.
Wetherell, M. (2008). Subjectivity or psycho-discursive practices? Investigating complex intersectional identities. Subjectivity, 22(1), 73-81.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williams, D. (2006). On and off the’net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628.
Williams, R. L., & Cothrel, J. (2000). Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81-92.
Wilson, A. (2007). Deluded by Dawkins? A Christian Response to the God Delusion. Colorado Springs, CO: Kingsway Books.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillian.
Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and discourse. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Wodak, R., & Chilton, P. A. (2005). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology, and interdisciplinary: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wodak, R., De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity: Edinburgh University Press.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Wooffitt, R. (2001). Researching psychic practitioners: Conversation analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data. A guide for analysis (pp. 49–92). London: Sage.
Wozny, L. A. (1989). The application of metaphor, analogy, and conceptual models in computer systems. Interacting with Computers, 1(3), 273-283.
Wray, M., & Newitz, A. (1997). White trash: Race and class in America: Psychology Press.
Yanow, D. (2004). Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries*. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), S9-S25.
Yates, S. J. (2001). Researching internet interaction: Sociolinguistics and corpus analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 93-146). London: Sage.
YokedtoJesus. (2009). are YOU garbage in GOD's eyes? Retrieved September 2009, 2009, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fShrXBWn1tI
YokedtoJesus. (2009). I doubt JezuzFreek is saved… Retrieved April 21, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAm5HUfSO4U
YokedtoJesus. (2009). Truce Retrieved September 17, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGk-gIi2_J4
YokedtoJesus. (2010). Common Ground... a miraculous meeting Retrieved July 11, 2011, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqC7PSy2U7U
YokedtoJesus. (n.d.). YouTube - YokedtoJesus's Channel Retrieved August 5, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/user/YokedtoJesus
Young, R. (1981). Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.
YouTube. (2008). YouTube Privacy Policy Retrieved November 11, 2008, from http://uk.youtube.com/t/privacy
YouTube. (n.d.). YouTube community guidelines Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
Zacharias, R. (2008). The End Of Reason: A Response To The New Atheists. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
Zadech, L. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
Zanotto, M. S., Cameron, L., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (Eds.). (2008). Confronting Metaphor in Use: An applied linguistic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zanotto, M. S., & Palma, D. V. (2008). Opening Pandora's box: Multiple readings of 'a metaphor'. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting Metaphor in Use: An Applied Linguistic Approach (pp. 11–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zdenek, S. (1999). Rising up from the MUD: Inscribing gender in software design. Discourse & Society, 10(3), 379.
Zhao, S. (2006). Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 844-862.
